Nature. 2026 Feb; 650(8100): 129-140

Roland Heynkes 13.4.2026, CC BY-SA-4.0 DE

If you cannot read German-language texts, you could try a translation into your native language with DeepL.

Links zu anderen Bereichen meiner Internetseiten:

wissenschaftliche Quellen Glossar buchunabhängige Lerntexte Fernsehdokumentationen digitale Arbeitsblätter außerschulische Lernangebote meine Biologieseiten meine Startseite

Gliederung

Datensatznummer
Autoren
Titel
Quellenangabe
Abstract
Sprache
aus der Publikation übernommener Text
kritische Zusammenfassung
lokales Archiv

nach oben NR BACU

nach oben AU Christopher J. Kay, Anja Spang, Gergely J. Szöllosi, Davide Pisani, Tom A. Williams, Philip C.J. Donoghue

nach oben TI Dated gene duplications elucidate the evolutionary assembly of eukaryotes

nach oben QU Nature. 2026 Feb; 650(8100): 129-140. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09808-z. Epub 2025 Dec 3

nach oben AB The origin of eukaryotes was a formative but poorly understood event in the history of life. Current hypotheses of eukaryogenesis differ principally in the timing of mitochondrial endosymbiosis relative to the acquisition of other eukaryote novelties [1]. Discriminating among these hypotheses has been challenging, because there are no living lineages representative of intermediate steps within eukaryogenesis. However, many eukaryotic cell functions are contingent on genes that emerged from duplication events during eukaryogenesis [2,3]. Consequently, the timescale of these duplications can provide insights into the sequence of steps in the evolutionary assembly of the eukaryotic cell. Here we show, using a relaxed molecular clock [4], that the process of eukaryogenesis spanned the Mesoarchaean to late Palaeoproterozoic eras. Within these constraints, we dated the timing of these gene duplications, revealing that the eukaryotic host cell already had complex cellular features before mitochondrial endosymbiosis, including an elaborated cytoskeleton, membrane trafficking, endomembrane, phagocytotic machinery and a nucleus, all between 3.0 and 2.25 billion years ago, after which mitochondrial endosymbiosis occurred. Our results enable us to reject mitochondrion-early scenarios of eukaryogenesis [5], instead supporting a complexified-archaean, late-mitochondrion sequence for the assembly of eukaryote characteristics. Our inference of a complex archaeal host cell is compatible with hypotheses on the adaptive benefits of syntrophy [6,7] in oceans that would have remained largely anoxic for more than a billion years [8,9].

nach oben SP englisch

nach oben VT References

  1. Donoghue, P. C. J. et al. Defining eukaryotes to dissect eukaryogenesis. Curr. Biol.33, R919–R929 (2023). - DOI - PubMed
  2. Vosseberg, J. et al. Timing the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity with ancient duplications. Nat. Ecol. Evol.5, 92–100 (2021). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  3. Tria, F. D. K. et al. Gene duplications trace mitochondria to the onset of eukaryote complexity. Genome Biol. Evol.13, evab055 (2021). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
  4. Álvarez-Carretero, S. et al. A species-level timeline of mammal evolution integrating phylogenomic data. Nature602, 263–267 (2022). - DOI - PubMed
  5. Martin, W. & Müller, M. The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote. Nature392, 37–41 (1998). - DOI - PubMed
  6. López-Garcia, P. & Moreira, D. Metabolic symbiosis at the origin of eukaryotes. Trends Biochem. Sci.24, 88–93 (1999). - DOI - PubMed
  7. López-García, P. & Moreira, D. The syntrophy hypothesis for the origin of eukaryotes revisited. Nat. Microbiol.5, 655–667 (2020). - DOI - PubMed
  8. Fakhraee, M., Hancisse, O., Canfield, D. E., Crowe, S. A. & Katsev, S. Proterozoic seawater sulfate scarcity and the evolution of ocean–atmosphere chemistry. Nat. Geosci.12, 375–380 (2019). - DOI
  9. Wang, C. et al. Strong evidence for a weakly oxygenated ocean-atmosphere system during the Proterozoic. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA119, e2116101119 (2022). - DOI - PMC - PubMed

nach oben ZF Inhalt

nach oben LA bacu.pdf

Adresse

Nachhilfe